home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Offline 2 / NetNews Offline Volume 2.iso / news / comp / sys / amiga / graphics / 2805 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1996-08-05  |  963 b 
  1. Path: news.internetMCI.com!news-admin
  2. From: dgentry@vlsi4.racal.com (Dave Gentry)
  3. Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.graphics
  4. Subject: Re: Which is better?  VistaPro or Scenery Animator?
  5. Date: Mon, 08 Apr 1996 18:54:40 GMT
  6. Organization: InternetMCI
  7. Message-ID: <4kbcr5$i0a@news.internetmci.com>
  8. References: <4ibtlt$d46@news.internetmci.com> <oj6g2avlfus.fsf@hpsrk.fc.hp.com> <1399.6669T1420T210@eskimo.com> <questarDpHGoo.Czn@netcom.com>
  9. NNTP-Posting-Host: rdgw.racal.com
  10. X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
  11.  
  12. questar@netcom.com (Chris Hanson) wrote:
  13.  
  14. >Wendell Watanabe (wendell@eskimo.com) wrote:
  15.  
  16. Concerning WCS v2:
  17.  
  18. >  General landscape detail, tree/foliage realism and antialiasing have
  19. >all been improved, in addition to the new water, cloud, rock and
  20. >atmospheric effects in V2.
  21.  
  22. I heard that the trees in WCS were actually bitmapped images, that
  23. looked fake when zooming in.  I also heard that the trees/foliage in
  24. Vista Pro were more convincing at close range.
  25.  
  26.